Monday, December 01, 2008

Imagine for a moment the task given to Denis Diderot. He was asked to translate a work of reference titled the "Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences". His resume at the time included such works as the translation of the "History of Greece (1743)", a translation of Robert James' "Medical Dictionary (1746)" and what is commonly known to be a free rendering of a previously published book "Inquiry Concerning Virtue and Merit (1745)". Not known for staying within the boundaries, Diderot took the challenge of translating the book but did so on his own terms.

He wanted to do more than simply translate the work. This philosopher turned lawyer turned writer wanted to elevate the Cyclopedia to include a collection of active contributions by writers of his day, the very people he believed that were providing the cultivated class with new ideas and knowledge. He was worried that many of these great thinkers were not getting the exposure they needed to change the course of civilization.

Diderot believed his work, which he called an encyclopedia "ought to make good the failure to execute such a project hitherto, and should encompass not only the fields already covered by the academies, but each and every branch of human knowledge." From this collection of information, all in one place, the encyclopedia would have, "the power to change men's common way of thinking."

I mention Diderot at the beginning of Chapter 13 with good reason. Looking inside an equity fund that focuses on value forces you to approach the investment with a wary eye. I quote Diderot: "Skepticism is the first step on the road to philosophy" and it is an important element in the purchase of this type of an equity mutual fund.

Funds as we have found out, are affected by market inefficiencies and in the equity arena, these problems are amplified. Investors rely on analysis of companies as do managers of funds. But that analysis can often be left wanting, especially when it comes to value funds. Value funds you will learn, tap into a market that has slower growth, pays larger dividends than growth stocks and is otherwise, on the border of doing good or bad depending on how much market share they can hold on to.
Posted by Paul Petillo at 07:16:11 | Permanent Link | Comments (0) |